Anonymised studies of how independent governance and senior delivery leadership shape outcomes on real programmes. Each case study describes a pattern we have seen and what we did about it.
An Australian mining services group ran a nine-month SAP HRIS rapid deployment for around 15,000 operational staff. Most rapid deployments hit the timeline by relaxing governance. This one did not. The discipline was the reason it landed.
A major Australian state government department ran an 18-month SAP SuccessFactors HCM programme across more than 100,000 staff. The boundaries between SOWs are where most multi-SOW programmes drift. This one did not.
A three-year Dayforce HRIS programme had spent $4M and not yet reached scale build. Independent governance and advisory led to its strategic closure, protecting client investment from a fourth-year sunk-cost commitment that the business case no longer justified.
Sector, region, scale, platform, and timeline are accurate. Organisation and individual names stay private. The point of each study is the pattern inside the programme, because the patterns travel. If one of these resonates with where your programme sits, the first conversation is free.
If a case study above resonates with where your programme sits, the next step is a conversation. No sales process, no pitch deck.
Get in Touch